BlogBlond

Sunday, March 12, 2006

Red Is For Love And Other Moral Dilemmas That Aren't

recent news reports about the south dakota abortion law had me both cheering and cringing. i cheered because finally some people somewhere had the guts to just do the right thing and challenge the high holy roe v. wade. i cringed because of the lack of exception for rape and incest. then, i felt like a big knee jerk.

several years ago, when i was teaching high school, one of my students brought a grave problem to my attention. another one of her teachers, a recent college grad, had explained to the class that teachers shouldn't grade papers in red ink because red was a color that said "stop". this new teacher, fresh from the indoctrination of the psychobabble of an american university, graded only in green, a color which said, "go". when i handed back a bunch of graded papers, complete with smiley faces, balloons, and even confetti (if the score was high enough to merit a party...), my students grimaced in dismay. they explained my faux pas, in slow careful words, as if an old-fangled teacher like me could not possibly have been expected to comprehend this new-fangled understanding of children's sensitive minds. i informed them that they had it all wrong, and, in actual fact, red was a color of love. witness the schoolgirl drawing hearts all over her books- red, red, red... lipstick kisses on the mirror? red. all manner of valentine's day gifts and confections? red and more red. so really, when i mark their papers in red, it shows that i love them and care about them becoming literate and succeeding in the future. after a few weeks, the ban on red ink faded away, like so many other fads, but that experience stayed with me, showing me the power of programming people's expectations and reactions. what a paradigm shift...

so, what does this have to do with babies and abortions? it's all about the paradigm shift. what if, and please just go with this for a second- we are so trained to look at carrying a baby who is the result of rape or incest as a victimization that we don't even stop to think about shifting the paradigm? what if, instead of viewing the pregnancy as a further abuse perpetrated on the victim, we were trained to look at it as a totally redemptive thing? how about viewing the baby as the only good to come out of a tragedy? what would our perspective be if, throughout our lives, we had heard about these heroic girls, who in spite of horrible acts inflicted on them, were so privledged that they were able to bring new (innocent!) life into the world? i have been so indocrinated to believe that this baby that would grow inside of the girl like a cancer, would be a constant, festering reminder of probably one of the worst times in her life, that i can barely wrap my mind around the idea that this might not objectively be the case. what if human life (or at least new, innocent human life) was so valued in our society that pregnancy resulting from rape or incest would be the moral equivalent of having a burglar in your home leave behind a lottery ticket which turns out to have all the winning numbers? the original event was an abomination, but the aftermath was completely transformative and uplifing. how much more clarity would we have if we could look beyond what we have been trained to believe and just accept a paradigm shift?

what would society look like if protecting innocent human life was never a moral dilemma?

what if red pen really just shows up better against black or blue ink?

what if every decision uplifted instead of agitating or disturbing?

what if having a baby really is like winning the lottery?

just some food for thought after a long hiatus...

6 Comments:

  • At Sunday, March 12, 2006 2:53:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    If someone was so disturbed by the burglary of their home that they couldn't handle the thought of accepting anything from the perp, there's no law stopping him from throwing out the lottery ticket. OK, true, nobody would throw out a winning lottery ticket, but then again, the trauma of a rape is somewhat more severe than that of a burglary. The point is shouldn't the victim have a choice?
    However, with all that said, the idea of thinking of having a baby as winning a lottery ticket is refreshing and liberating. It should be obvious that bringing new life into the world is the greatest possible blessing. But our society is so "it's all about me", that living for someone else and having ME be second priority sometimes, is scary and problematic.
    So thank you for the new perspective. It's definitely something to think about.
    - rebel without a clue

     
  • At Sunday, March 12, 2006 2:56:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    i vote that doing the right thing should become a moral imperitive instead of a moral dilemma.

     
  • At Monday, March 13, 2006 8:06:00 AM, Blogger Sara said…

    It's been too long, by the way... But on to my comment.

    I had never thought of that baby as a winning lottery ticket, and you make a good case. It's a wonderful thought. Still, that shift would not happen all at once, leaving victims with babies and the single option of illegal abortion. This attitude might be accepted in time, but until then women would be getting illegal and dangerous abortions anyway.

    That law just has to wait till the time when we're ready for it. In the meantime, that law isn't working for the people.

    Does that make any sense the way I've explained it?

     
  • At Monday, March 13, 2006 10:16:00 AM, Blogger BlogBlond said…

    hey rebel, welcome to the blog!- you make a good case, but this is where i would take the analogy: it's exactly the point that nobody (or almost nobody) would just throw out the winning ticket. they might give all of the money away to charity, or spend it to upgrade security in their home, or to really get back at the "perp" they might set up some kind of education program to deter future home invaders. the point is, something comstructive would be done with the winnings, not something DEstructive. i can't really see anyone setting the ticket on fire or flushing it down the toilet to spite the offender. and that is the logical end of the analogy of a baby to a winning ticket. even if the baby is adopted out, or raised by someone else, that winning ticket mentality is that the best revenge is to live well and enjoy your lot. the baby is a gift, regardledd of how it began.

    anon- me too!

    yes, chick. even croutons have value...;)

    sara- right, so the idea is that the "victims" do have other options besides illegal abortion. in spite of the 9 month reminder of the original terrible event, i have a pretty strong feeling that even women who don't get pregnant take a heck of a lot longer than 9 months to "get over" rape or incest. so the myth of a woman "moving on" by aborting her baby is false. it might get rid of the need for her to tell anyone else how she became pregnant (as if that's anyone's business...), but i highly doubt it does anything to soothe the internal pain and anguish she has about the original assault. if resources were directed to give these "victims" a safe place to go for the pregnancy, or to provide comfort to them during that time, maybe they could be made to see that they are heroes and not victims at all. if we change the characterization, we reflect back a whole different reality to them about their sitaution. that's all i'm trying to get people to see.

    and thanks for missing the posts! :)

     
  • At Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:18:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I think the paradigm shift is a beautiful idea. But the key is education-- not taking away abortion rights. Rape is about taking away control and making the victim powerless. If you educate girls and women so that they see a pregnancy as something good coming out of a horrible event, then you might have fewer women being desperate enough to choose an abortion. I don't see anything good coming out of taking someone who has already lost so much and basically taking her body away from her for nine months. Giving her a positive choice is one thing, but why force someone who has ALREADY been forced? I've been raped. B"H, I didn't get pregnant-- and I think I would have rather died than accept any kind of gift from him. If someone told me I had to hold on to a winning lottery ticket from him for nine months-- nine months of NEVER being able to pretend that it never happened, nine months of knowing that what he did to me was stamped on my body for the world to see-- I don't think I would have been able to live through it.

     
  • At Wednesday, March 22, 2006 7:53:00 PM, Blogger BlogBlond said…

    ava- i just want to say that i am so sorry for what you must have gone through. there's pretty much nothing to argue with about what you said, but i just wanted you to know that your comment did not go unnoticed and i appreciate your input. hope your life since then has continued to get better and better!

     

Post a Comment

<< Home