BlogBlond

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

"Constitutional Rights"- The Race Card For Ill-Informed Crusaders

Okay, over the last week or so i have heard about 18 million things that made me think, "man, i should blog about that...".

last night i heard something that so blew me away by its sheer idiocy that i actually made a note to remember it so that i could rant about it.

so, here goes:

you know that i am all about nursing. you know that i am even to the extreme of most nursing moms with the whole family bed/nursing on demand around the clock thing. i think that a mom should nurse her baby when her baby needs her, but there are certain limits of just common decency that i may or may not have time to throw in at the end of this post.

here's what got me last night. there was a case in ann arbor, michigan- the berkley, CA of the midwest- where a woman was nursing her baby at the local YMCA while her other child swam in the pool. clearly offended by the total lack of modesty shown by discreetly nursing under a t-shirt, the bikini-wearing lifeguard and other similarly clad swimmers objected to this shocking display and asked her to leave the pool area. when they realized how completely foolish they sounded (yes, we can wear bathing suits of all shapes and sizes, but you cannot show 1/4 inch of the side of your breast while you nurse becasue it is too shocking to our delicate sensibilities...) they told her that she was violating the regulation against having food in the pool area. i WISH i was making that up!

anyway, all of the baby-toting crackpots turned out for this one- you know, the ones with their 6 year old tandem nursing with their toddler and newborn- yeah, annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnyway- they interviewed one of those women at a rally to show support. now, let me digress and say that i can totally get on board with saying that the no food rule clearly did not apply to the nursing mom transporting contraband in her breasts. i would fully support someone pointing out how ridiculous it is to be offended by some showing of skin when you are at a pool where people A) are wearing bathing suits, and B) are walking around the locker room stark naked...but this woman they interviewed, this intellectual giant, this well-read bastion of knowledge said she was really upset because, "...nursing infants have a constitutional right to eat!"

come again?

like i said, go ahead and feed your baby. more power to you! you have a right to feed your baby as long as you are being reasonably discreet and respectful of other people's personal space. but a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EAT????

so many times when something happens in politics, some random person will throw out the race card for no clear reason. not that there is any evidence of racism, implied or otherwise. not like everyone is sick to death of hearing race-whining- they will still cry racism for the stupidest least racist thing around. apparently, this has been replaced by crying constitutional violation...


club gitmo prisoners have constitutional rights even thought they are not US citizens and are not protected by our constitution? yeah, okay...

you have a constitutional right to smoke in a privately owned bar in new york, even though the owner and other patrons don't want you to? yeah, okay...

you have a constitutional right to not eat broccoli? import endangered species stolen from other continents? carry your box-cutters onto an airplane? yeah, whatever...

but "infants have a constitutional right to eat?" when did we, as a nation, stop thinking and start speaking in trite slogans that 90% of the population appears to latch onto even though they don't understand what they are saying?

i have always been among the snobby arrogant intellectual elite who belives that most people are dumber than i am - but seriously- are people getting that much stupider, or do i just have less patience?

12 Comments:

  • At Tuesday, February 07, 2006 2:17:00 PM, Blogger Sara said…

    !!!

     
  • At Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:45:00 PM, Blogger BlogBlond said…

    thanks, tailor! and sara, i know just what you mean ;)!

     
  • At Tuesday, February 07, 2006 5:51:00 PM, Blogger Josh said…

    Yum, the breakfast of champions! My only complaint against that woman is that she didn't follow the most basic etiquette of eating in public - "Don't bring it unless you have enough to share with the entire group."

     
  • At Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:19:00 AM, Blogger Dimmy said…

    Josh, you are surpassing even me in crude comments. You must stop before I sic BB at you with a butcher knife. I do appreciate the contrast they make with your photo, though!

     
  • At Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:25:00 AM, Blogger BlogBlond said…

    okay, i am hereby vowing to stop, for the entire forseeable future, and possibly beyond, posting anything that has to do with breasts.

    on another note- dimmy, josh is totally a keeper- maybe we can all have a reunion shabbos some time...

    and josh- uchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...

     
  • At Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:29:00 AM, Blogger Dimmy said…

    BB, being an orally-fixated obsessive-compulsive neo-freudian, I would like to point out that there is a slight difference between immodest clothing and breast-feeding in public. The difference is in a male's perception of the act.

    * evil grin in the anticipation of an ensuing tasty discussion *

     
  • At Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:00:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    dimmy - This is why we love you - always there to stir up the hornets nest.

    call me some time.

    Blogbrit

     
  • At Wednesday, February 08, 2006 3:58:00 PM, Blogger Josh said…

    Dimmy - Are you calling BB an "Orally fixated, etc." or staking that claim for yourself? I just want to know which of you is my bashert.

    BB - Let's face it. Your blog is about writing whatever's on your mind. Or lack thereof, but that's another story. At least you have edge. But if you're going to write about female body functions, you have to expect the 8th grade boys in the back row to break out with the giggles. And that should explain why breast-feeding in public should not be allowed too...

    The Brit - So now the love quadrangle is complete?

     
  • At Thursday, February 09, 2006 5:25:00 AM, Blogger BlogBlond said…

    josh- happily, or unhappily- that would be dimmy who is your orally fixated bashert...

     
  • At Thursday, February 09, 2006 6:13:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    josh - I will leave the love quadrangle to the blogblond - I'm just here to sit back and be entertained.

    blogbrit

     
  • At Monday, February 13, 2006 2:38:00 PM, Blogger Dimmy said…

    Please, do not involve me in any kind of 'angles. I am a Flatlander by nature. Better yet - a LineLander - I only like one-dimensional relationships. And this bi-angle is already filled. Sorry, Josh, BB, BlogBrit, and whomever else CG or ES wants to accuse me of having an affair with. :)

    But we are digressing here (intentionally?). I think (and apparently Josh agrees with me) that men are perpetually at the 8th grade level, and for that very reason, perception of bodily "acts" is magnified a lot more than bodily "sights". Additional (and unrelated) argument point would be this: what is it about breastfeeding that excuses its public display? Sometimes I need to go number one real bad with no WC around, so why can't I urinate on a tree (New Yorkers, read: tire) while discreetly covering myself? Ah, that's public exposure. So what is breastfeeding?

     
  • At Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:13:00 AM, Blogger BlogBlond said…

    dimmy- do you actually equate feeding your child with wizzing on a tree? just because you did not breastfeed long enough as a child, don't ruin it for the rest of humanity, okay?

    and enjoy your bi-relationship ;)

     

Post a Comment

<< Home